Romance
books since the beginning of time have portrayed unhealthy relationships with
submissive females succumbing to their desires with controlling men, and some
are concerned as these themes make their way into young adult fiction that the
impressionable minds of teens will be swayed to model their own relationships
after these unhealthy ones.
Since Twilight’s release it has come under crossfire for portraying the relationship between a meek female girl and her stalkerish, controlling vampire boyfriend as a healthy relationship when there are obvious unhealthy aspects of their partnership. Another book, Graceling by Kristen Cashore, takes the opposite approach to the relationship in its story with a strong independent female lead, however I find this relationship to be just as unhealthy as the one in Stephanie Meyer's Twilight.
To be
fair, Twilight and Graceling aren’t the only books with unhealthy relationships
in them. Literature is full of unhealthy relationships, just look at Heathcliff
and Catherine from Wuthering Heights.
Their relationship was (no pun intended) the height of dysfunction, however at
least Heathcliff and Catherine were equally selfish, and horrible to one
another. Or look at Shakespeare’s Romeo
and Juliet, Twilight has been criticized for portraying this unequivocal,
undying, I can’t live without you kind of love between Bella and Edward but,
this concept isn’t at all new. (Though you could argue that Romeo and Juliet
did it better). Also, there is a difference between showing unhealthy
relationships in books and showing unhealthy relationships as if they were
healthy. In Wuthering Heights it was obvious that Heathcliff and Cathy did not
have a healthy relationship, this was not as obvious in Twilight nor Graceling.
Now, I don't want to comment on writing style or anything else with these books. I just want to focus on the relationships they display. So, here's a short side by side comparison.
Now, I don't want to comment on writing style or anything else with these books. I just want to focus on the relationships they display. So, here's a short side by side comparison.
| |
Main Character: Bella
– clumsy, weak, overly-trusting, average,
Love Interest: Edward - mysterious, brooding, overprotective, possesive,
secretive
Novel’s view on
sex: absolutely wait until you’re married, even if you're only eighteen or over a hundred.
Edward has the
power in his relationship with Bella. In New Moon he leaves thinking he’s
trying to protect Bella, but he makes this decision completely on his own
without letting Bella have any say in it. He makes a number of decisions for
the both of them without taking what Bella wants into account.
Edward is
physically stronger than Bella.
Edward treats
Bella like she’s fragile and in need of protecting.
Edward keeps
secrets from Bella about what he is. When Bella finds out what he is she instantly
trusts him completely.
|
Main Character: Katsa
– strong, agile, empowered, guarded, an outcast, hot temper
Love Interest: Po - snarky, charming, bold,
secretive
Novel’s view on
sex: there’s no need to have commitment of any kind with those you sleep
with.
Katsa has the
power in her relationship with Po. She tells him that she might just up and
leave one day, without any regard to Po’s feelings or suggestion of
commitment to their relationship. She only asks if he can handle this. Katsa calls the shots in her relationship
keeping herself guarded and untrusting.
Katsa is
physically stronger than Po.
Katsa and Po spar
together until Po is covered in bruises.
Po keeps secrets
from Katsa about what he is. When Katsa discovers Po’s secret she’s so mad at
him she doesn’t even want to let him explain.
|
In
neither of these books are the characters equals with their partners, though
one could argue that by the end of the Twilight saga Edward and Bella become
equals, as they could with Graceling. And in truth, just because one character
is physically stronger than their partner does not mean they can’t have an
equal relationship. The problem with the inequality of both Bella and Edward’s
relationship as well as Katsa and Po’s is that one character holds all the
power in the relationship where the other has none. This is unhealthy.
In
Twilight Bella would do anything for Edward, she’s willing to die for him, and
he becomes the only thing of any importance in her life. This all encompassing view of Edward that she has is not healthy. But, it's not healthy to get into a relationship where you're unwilling to open up to the other person either. In Graceling
Katsa has no interest in relationships what so ever. She hates the idea of marriage
and thinks of it as this horrible oppressive thing that has absolutely no
benefits. After a few chapters she’s so afraid of giving up her newfound
freedom that she offers zero commitment to Po when the attraction starts to
grow between them. In both of these cases these relationships are presented as
healthy when they are not. A healthy relationship has both equality as well as
commitment, these things are essential for happiness and trust.
One
thing I will say is that in Twilight the negative aspects of Bella and Edward’s
relationship were not glorified (despite what some may say, I truly do not think they were). The unhealthy choices made, such as Edward
leaving Bella for "her own good", do not turn out well and it’s obvious later that
these were bad decisions to have made, though at the time they are made they
are presented as perfectly normal decisions to be making in a relationship.
And, as for Graceling it does seem that by the end of the book Katsa does
develop some kind of commitment to Po, though she continues to hate the idea of
marriage and still refuses to see anything positive about it. (I guess I just wish Bella had given Edward a little more grief for leaving her and I wish Po hadn't been so calm about Katsa's inability to give him even an ounce of commitment)
My
reason for writing this post is that Twilight has gotten a lot of backlash for
portraying an unhealthy relationship, however I think Graceling shows the same
level of unhealthy attitude in a relationship the difference being that the
roles are switched from a man having all the power in a relationship to a woman
having all the power in a relationship, but no one is talking about Graceling
being unhealthy. When a man gets into a relationship with zero commitment to the woman we call him a "player" but when a woman does it she's "empowered"? The truth is the relationships in Twilight and in Graceling are both unhealthy. It doesn’t matter whether it’s a man
or a woman who’s being controlling and holding all the power in a relationship,
it’s wrong either way. Couples should work together to compromise and make each
other feel supported.
Now, I’m not saying
these are bad books. I enjoyed both of them, and I certainly loved Wuthering
Heights. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with writing about a relationship
that has unhealthy elements in it in a story, because let’s be honest, that’s
reality. Relationships can be unhealthy sometimes. People do sometimes feel so
engrossed in another person that it feels like they’d die without them, and
they do build up walls to protect themselves and fear commitment. But, the
young adults who are reading these books need to recognize that the unhealthy
parts of these stories are not okay. And, honestly I think they will. Young
adults are not going to be brainwashed into thinking that your boyfriend not
allowing you to see one of your friends is okay. They’re gonna say, “Hey, that
was really messed up that Bella had to sneak out to see Jacob.” Or at least,
that’s what I hope.